Can you trust the Maine Courts?

Consider what Professor Guffin has to say in his latest blog post, Maintaining Public Trust in State Courts: Why Privacy Matters:

“Under Maine’s constitution, judicial power is vested exclusively in the Supreme Judicial Court.  Of course, with the exercise of such power comes certain responsibilities, one of which is to preserve the institutional integrity of the court system so that it can fulfill its mission “[t]o administer justice by providing a safe, accessible, efficient and impartial system of dispute resolution that serves the public interest, protects individual rights and instills respect for the law.”

As an integral part of our state government, the MJB has a duty to protect the personal information entrusted to the state courts by Maine citizens.  While its exact contours might be difficult to define, that duty is firmly rooted in the Maine Constitution and the judicial branch’s institutional charge to maintain public trust and confidence in the state court system.  It means that the courts should treat personal information in accordance with the expectations under which it was disclosed in the first place.  Citizens rightfully have come to trust that the courts will handle their personal information discreetly, so that disclosure of the information will not later be used by others to harm them.

Preserving citizens’ trust in the state court system requires that the MJB adopt and implement digital court records access rules that maintain that trust, not destroy it.  If the rules do not adequately protect peoples’ privacy, the public’s expectations of trust in the courts will be broken, de-incentivizing citizens from interacting with the court system.

Abandonment of the state courts in favor of private justice tribunals by the wealthy and others who have a choice whether to interact with the courts is one thing.  Among other issues, it would leave the court system without powerful advocates.  It is another thing entirely for many of the poor and most vulnerable people in our population for whom there is no real choice.  They will be forced to use an underfunded court system lacking adequate privacy protection, and to do so at their own peril.

It will be a sad day if the digital transformation of the state courts causes Maine citizens to lose trust in the state’s judicial system.”

Read the full blog– Maintaining Public Trust in State Courts: Why Privacy Matters

The full series can be found at: The Privacy Law Perspectives Blog 

https://www.privacylawperspectives.com/?utm_source=vuture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=%7Bvx:campaign%20name%7D

Is Maine’s Supreme Court Rolling the Dice with Personal Privacy Policies?

In the third in a series of blog posts about digital court records access, privacy expert Peter Guffin explains why he thinks so.

Professor Guffin inquires why the SJC is not using technology solutions that appear to be offered by their selected vendor

He asks why the SJC is putting the burden on filers to identify and seek protection of information; and states,

“[r]elying on filers to serve the privacy gatekeeping function is fraught with peril and not good public policy. It will only serve to erode the public’s trust in the Maine court system.”

Read the full post: Rolling the Dice: How Not to Protect Privacy

https://www.privacylawperspectives.com/2020/06/04/rolling-the-dice-how-not-to-protect-privacy/

And the full series is available, here:

https://www.privacylawperspectives.com/?utm_source=vuture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=%7Bvx:campaign%20name%7D

How to Provide Court (Records) Access During a Pandemic?

Portland Press Herald Article 6/1/20

As courts across the country have been forced to move online during the pandemic, issues relating to access abound. Citizen access to the courthouses has been limited, and public and media access to proceedings has been hampered as Maine courts scramble to keep cases moving and justice available during the COVID-19 scourge.

A coalition of press and civil liberties groups signed a letter that outlined suggestions for broader public access to court proceedings nationwide, like sharing dial-in information before court events and waiving fees for online access to documents.

“As we move into the next phase of the way that public institutions are responding to the pandemic, it is going to be important to take account of public access,” said Zachary Heiden, legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine. “That’s true in the Legislature or any government bodies, and it’s especially true in the courts.”

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is tracking public access to judicial proceedings and so far has found that the response has been varied.

See full article from link below:

https://www.pressherald.com/2020/06/01/maine-courts-struggle-with-public-access-during-pandemic/